Skip to main content
Governance Authority
Category: Sustainability and ESG

SASB Standards

Also known as: SASB, Sustainability Accounting Standards Board Standards
Simply put

SASB Standards are a set of industry-specific guidelines that help companies identify and report on sustainability-related risks and opportunities that may matter to investors. They are organized by industry so that companies disclose the environmental, social, and governance (ESG) topics most relevant to their sector. The Standards are now maintained by the IFRS Foundation.

Formal definition

SASB Standards are industry-based sustainability disclosure standards designed to surface information about sustainability-related risks and opportunities that is likely to be decision-useful for investors. Structured around a Conceptual Framework that sets out the underlying concepts, principles, definitions, and objectives, the Standards provide sector-specific metrics for measuring and disclosing ESG-related risks and opportunities. Responsibility for the Standards now sits with the IFRS Foundation, and they inform the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. These entries are educational and not legal, audit, or compliance advice; whether use of SASB Standards is voluntary or forms part of a binding disclosure requirement depends on the applicable jurisdiction, sector, and regulatory regime.

Why it matters

SASB Standards address a persistent challenge in sustainability reporting: identifying which environmental, social, and governance topics are genuinely relevant to a given business and its investors. Because the Standards are organized by industry, they help companies focus disclosure on the sustainability-related risks and opportunities most likely to be decision-useful for investors in their specific sector, rather than reporting on a generic checklist of topics that may have limited bearing on financial performance. For boards and management teams navigating growing investor demand for consistent, comparable sustainability information, this industry-specific approach offers a structured way to frame what to disclose.

The significance of the Standards has grown with their transfer to the IFRS Foundation, the body responsible for the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. This consolidation places SASB Standards within a broader global effort to build a more coherent sustainability disclosure architecture, and the Standards now inform the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. For governance professionals, understanding where SASB Standards sit within this landscape matters when advising on disclosure strategy and monitoring how emerging reporting expectations may evolve.

It is important to be clear about status: whether use of SASB Standards is voluntary or forms part of a binding disclosure requirement depends on the applicable jurisdiction, sector, and regulatory regime. These entries are educational and not legal, audit, or compliance advice. Companies should assess their specific obligations rather than assume the Standards are universally mandatory or purely optional.

Who it's relevant to

Boards and Board Committees
Directors and committees with oversight of sustainability disclosure can use SASB Standards as a reference point for understanding which industry-specific ESG risks and opportunities may be decision-useful to investors. The board's role is typically oversight rather than preparation; directors should confirm with management and advisers whether and how the Standards apply given the company's jurisdiction, sector, and regulatory obligations.
General Counsel and Compliance Officers
Legal and compliance functions may need to assess whether use of SASB Standards is voluntary or connected to a binding disclosure requirement in the relevant jurisdiction and sector, particularly as the Standards now inform the IFRS Sustainability Disclosure Standards. This assessment depends on the applicable regulatory regime and warrants professional judgment rather than assumption.
Sustainability and Reporting Teams
Teams responsible for preparing sustainability disclosures can use the industry-specific metrics and the underlying Conceptual Framework to identify and report the ESG topics most relevant to their sector. Supporting tools maintained under the IFRS Foundation, including materiality and industry classification resources, can assist in determining which topics apply.
Investors and Analysts
Investors and analysts seeking comparable, sector-relevant sustainability information are the primary intended audience of the Standards, which are designed to surface information likely to be decision-useful for investment analysis. Users should note that the extent and consistency of company adoption may vary depending on the jurisdiction and regulatory context.

Inside SASB

Industry-Specific Standards
SASB Standards are organized by industry, providing disclosure topics and associated metrics tailored to the sustainability matters generally considered financially material within each of a defined set of industries. This industry-based approach distinguishes them from broader, entity-agnostic frameworks.
Financial Materiality Focus
The standards concentrate on sustainability-related information reasonably likely to affect an entity's financial condition, operating performance, or enterprise value, rather than attempting to capture the full range of an organization's impacts on society and the environment.
Disclosure Topics and Metrics
For each industry, the standards identify specific disclosure topics along with accounting metrics (quantitative and, in some cases, qualitative) and activity metrics intended to support comparable, decision-useful reporting.
Governance and Stewardship
Responsibility for the SASB Standards moved to the IFRS Foundation and the International Sustainability Standards Board (ISSB), which has integrated SASB's industry-based approach into its work. Practitioners should confirm the current status and any evolution of the standards under this stewardship.
Voluntary, Non-Binding Nature
SASB Standards are a voluntary reporting framework rather than binding law. Whether their use is required depends on the jurisdiction, listing rules, regulatory regime, or contractual commitments applicable to a given entity.

Common questions

Answers to the questions practitioners most commonly ask about SASB.

Are SASB Standards a legally binding disclosure requirement?
Generally, no. SASB Standards are voluntary reporting standards rather than binding law in most jurisdictions. They were developed to help companies communicate financially material sustainability information to investors, but adopting them is typically a matter of choice rather than legal obligation. That said, the picture is evolving: some regulators and mandatory disclosure regimes have drawn on or incorporated concepts consistent with SASB's approach, and the standards now sit under the IFRS Foundation's ISSB. Whether any sustainability disclosure is mandatory for a given entity depends on its jurisdiction, listing status, sector, and size, so you should confirm the specific requirements that apply to your organization. This entry is educational and not legal or compliance advice.
Do SASB Standards replace or duplicate other frameworks like GRI or TCFD?
Not exactly. SASB Standards are often described as complementary to, rather than a substitute for, other sustainability reporting frameworks. They are distinguished by their focus on financially material topics for investors and by their industry-specific approach, whereas other frameworks may address a broader set of stakeholders or impacts. Many organizations use more than one framework together, mapping topics across them. It is a misconception to treat these frameworks as interchangeable or to assume adopting one satisfies the objectives of another. The right combination depends on your reporting objectives, audience, and any applicable requirements, which is a matter for your organization's judgment.
How does an organization determine which SASB industry standard applies to it?
SASB Standards are organized by industry, with each standard identifying the sustainability topics and associated metrics considered financially material for that industry. An organization typically starts by identifying the industry classification that best reflects its business activities, recognizing that diversified entities may span more than one. Because the fit is not always obvious, this determination generally involves judgment by management, often with input from finance, sustainability, and investor relations functions. Where a company operates across multiple industries, it may need to consider more than one standard. Confirm current industry definitions and any related guidance from the standard-setter when making this determination.
Which function within an organization typically owns SASB-aligned reporting?
Ownership varies by organization, but reporting aligned with SASB Standards is commonly coordinated by management functions such as finance, investor relations, or a dedicated sustainability team, given the focus on investor-relevant, financially material information. The board or a relevant committee generally exercises oversight rather than preparing the disclosures directly, consistent with the distinction between the board's oversight role and management's operational responsibilities. Assurance functions, where engaged, provide independent evaluation rather than ownership. The specific allocation of responsibility should be defined in the organization's governance structure and reflect how it manages other financial and non-financial reporting.
What is the relationship between SASB Standards and an organization's materiality assessment?
SASB Standards reflect a view of the sustainability topics generally considered financially material at the industry level, but they do not remove the need for an organization to apply judgment to its own circumstances. In practice, companies often use the relevant industry standard as a starting reference and then assess which topics are actually material to their business, which may result in additions, omissions, or explanations. The concept of materiality can differ across frameworks and regulatory regimes, so it is important to be clear about which materiality lens is being applied. This determination is fact-specific and depends on the organization's own analysis.
How might an organization approach obtaining assurance over SASB-aligned disclosures?
Assurance over sustainability disclosures is generally optional unless required by an applicable regime, and its scope and level can vary. An organization considering assurance would typically clarify what is being assured, distinguish between the design of the underlying data controls and their operating effectiveness, and select an appropriate level of assurance and provider. Because assurance standards, provider qualifications, and any mandatory requirements differ by jurisdiction and evolve over time, an organization should confirm the current expectations and engage qualified professionals. This entry is educational and not audit, assurance, or compliance advice.

Common misconceptions

SASB Standards are legally mandatory for all reporting entities.
SASB Standards are generally a voluntary framework, not binding law. Any obligation to apply them typically arises only where a specific jurisdiction, regulator, listing authority, or contract references or incorporates them; requirements vary by jurisdiction, sector, and entity type.
SASB Standards cover the full scope of an organization's sustainability impacts.
The standards are designed around financial materiality, information relevant to enterprise value and financial performance, rather than the broader impact on society and the environment addressed by some other frameworks. This scope limitation is intentional and should not be overstated.
SASB Standards remain a standalone framework maintained separately from other standard setters.
Stewardship of the SASB Standards has moved to the IFRS Foundation and the ISSB, which has incorporated the industry-based approach into its work. Practitioners should verify the current standing and any changes rather than assuming the framework operates in isolation.

Best practices

Confirm whether, and how, SASB Standards apply to your entity by checking applicable jurisdictional rules, listing requirements, and any contractual or investor commitments, rather than assuming voluntary use equals no obligation.
Select the industry standard that best matches your business activities and document the rationale, recognizing that the standards are organized around industry-specific disclosure topics and metrics.
Apply the financial materiality lens consistently, distinguishing information relevant to enterprise value from broader impact reporting that may fall under other frameworks.
Assign clear accountability for sustainability disclosure across management (preparation and controls), assurance functions (independent review where engaged), and the board or relevant committee (oversight of reporting integrity).
Monitor developments from the IFRS Foundation and ISSB, since stewardship of the standards sits there, and update reporting practices as the standards evolve.
Treat SASB-based disclosures as subject to the same governance, data quality, and internal control expectations as other external reporting, and obtain professional advice for jurisdiction- or fact-specific questions.